case_of_fafrowicz_v._poland.doc

interpretation of a legal provision were excluded from its jurisdiction (see Długołęcki v. Poland... is to evaluate the overall fairness of the criminal proceedings (see, also Taxquet v. Belgium [GC... to the interests of the public and the victims that crime is properly prosecuted (see, Gäfgen v. Germany [GC], no. 22978/05, § 175, ECHR 2010...) and, where necessary, to the rights of witnesses (see... been conducted fairly (see Gäfgen, cited above, § 162, and references therein). Article 6 § 3 (d
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,12,1.html

case-of-ziembinski-v.-poland.docx

, verifying whether the journalist has acted professionally and in good faith becomes paramount (see... caselaw (see, among other authorities, Cumpana and Mazare v. Romania [GC], no. 33348/96, §§ 8891, ECHR... role of "public watchdog" (see Bladet Tromso and Stensaas v. Norway [GC], no. 21980/93, §§ 59... a corruption affair in a local hospital (see paragraph 10 above). The Court - concurring with the position... of fact, which as such were susceptible to proof (see, Lingens v. Austria, 8 July 1986, § 46, Series
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,24,1.html

probacja_druk_12.05.pdf

. Reform requires an understanding of how the interaction takes place between prisons and certain entities... Wydawcy: 00-950 Warszawa, Al. Ujazdowskie 11, tel. 22 239 07 81, e-mail: wojtera@ms.gov.pl W związku z... 1986. 21 I. Paulus, The Search for Pure Foods: A Sociology of Legislation in Britain, Martin Robertson
http://ms.gov.pl/pl/probacja/2014/download,2718,14.html

case-of-p.f.-v.-poland.docx

order, allowing the applicant to see his daughters every Saturday between 9 a.m and 6 p.m. in their home... had delivered its first interim order (see paragraph 9 above), many of the visits had not taken place... of 9 March 2011 (see paragraph 20 above) had never been enforced because whenever he had come... interim orders (see paragraphs 9, 14, 20, 24 and 28 above). He maintained only that the Polish... (see paragraphs 30, 31, 33 and 35 above).Against this background, the Court concludes
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,625,1.html

jalowiecki_eng.doc

to lustration proceedings (see, Matyjek v. Poland (dec.), no. 38184/03, ECHR 2006... and Bobek v. Poland... of Poland's compliance with the requirements of a "fair trial" under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention (see... the date of service of the written judgment (see Worm v. Austria, § 33, 29 August 1997, Reports... it appropriate to examine the applicant's complaint under the two provisions taken together (see Edwards v... him at a substantial disadvantage visavis his opponent (see, for example, Jespers v. Belgium
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,228,1.html

043.pdf

szkoleń, materiały multimedialne itd. Link do strony, na której znajdują się dodatkowe informacje o... ……………………………………… Pieczęć zakładu poprawczego/schroniska dla nieletnich PRZYKŁAD DOBREJ PRAKTYKI Nazwa zakładu poprawczego/schronisk a dla nieletnich Schronisko dla Nieletnich i Zakład Poprawczy w Falenicy Imię i nazwisko dyrektora zp/sdn mgr Romuald Sadowski Adres Ul. Jachowicza 4 04-995 Warszawa Tel. 228729175 Fax. Tel. 228729089 e-mail sekretariat@ sdnzp-falenica.pl Imię i nazwisko autora mgr
http://ms.gov.pl/Data/Files/_public/zp-sdn/dobre-praktyki/043.pdf

kreuz_eng.doc

not see how the refusal to exempt him from payment of court fees could serve the interests of the proper administration of justice. Nor did he see how that refusal could be considered proportionate... , does not see any reason to hold otherwise. B. Compliance with Article 6 § 1 1. The applicant 36... a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v. the United... as to the observance of the Convention's requirements rests with the Court (see Golder and Z and Others, cited
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,59,1.html

kreuz_eng.doc

not see how the refusal to exempt him from payment of court fees could serve the interests of the proper administration of justice. Nor did he see how that refusal could be considered proportionate... , does not see any reason to hold otherwise. B. Compliance with Article 6 § 1 1. The applicant 36... a possibility of having access to the courts (see, among many other authorities, Golder v. the United... as to the observance of the Convention's requirements rests with the Court (see Golder and Z and Others, cited
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,124,1.html

razniak_eng.doc

, that period of his detention falls outside the scope of Article 5 § 3 (see Kudła v. Poland [GC... were stated in a number of its previous judgments (see, among many other authorities, Kudła v. Poland... with Article 5 § 3 (see Bąk, cited above, § 57). 27. The Court observes that in their decision to remand... to obtain extensive evidence (see paragraphs 7 and 8 above). Furthermore, the Government stated... , in particular the trial court, are better placed to examine all the circumstances of the case and take all
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,210,1.html

frankowicz_eng.doc

prospects of success (see Selmouni v. France [GC], no. 25803/94, § 76, ECHR 1999-V, and Mifsud v... (see, for example, V. v. the United Kingdom [GC], no. 24888/94, § 57, ECHR 1999IX). Moreover... that could reasonably be expected of him to exhaust the national channels of redress (see Aksoy v. Turkey, 18... that it is not inadmissible on any other grounds (see paragraph 32 above). It must therefore be declared... " (see, among many other authorities, Oberschlick v. Austria (no. 1), 23 May 1991, § 57, Series
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,215,1.html