baginski_eng.doc

" notice (see p. 15, volume I). [The applicant's] detention still has a basis within the meaning... to grant him retrospective leave to appeal out of time. He maintained that his counsel had withdrawn... until 4 August 1996 (see below). The second amendment, effected by the Law of 1 December 1995... such detention had been imposed before 4 August 1996 (see below, 3. "Statutory time-limits... proceedings; it did so only in respect of the investigative stage (see above, 1."Imposition
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,164,1.html

sosinowska-wersja-angielska.doc

accept, for the reasons outlined above (see paragraph 55) that the interference complained... far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that this complaint does... proceedings following the applicant's complaint against W.R.K. 24. On 22 August 2006 he instituted... (see paragraphs 8 to 17 above) was included in the case file. 27. On 14 September 2007 the Regional... to lodge a constitutional complaint was introduced in Article 79 § 1 which provides as follows
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,324,1.html

jablonska_eng.doc

between Ms J.P. and two other defendants be declared null and void (see paragraph 11 above). 15. On 13... of the proceedings brought against Mr S. and Mrs G.-S. (see paragraphs 10-13 above and paragraph 27... action to the Warsaw Regional Court (see paragraph 14 above) but the period to be taken... . The proceedings were terminated on 23 October 2002 (see paragraph 26 above). Their length accordingly... was at stake for the applicant in the litigation (see, for instance, Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,112,1.html

case-of-finster-v.-poland1.doc

in the case of Kauczor (see Kauczor v. Poland, no. 45219/06, § 2728 and 3035, 3 February 2009). C... (no. 17599/05) on 22 October 2009 (see §§ 75-85 and §§ 4588 respectively). More recent developments... October 2010 (see §§ 2554). THE LAW I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 3 OF THE CONVENTION 24... essentially the same objective is not required (see Yaşa v. Turkey judgment of 2 September 1998... his detention (see, by contrast, Bronk v. Poland (dec.), no. 30848/03, 11 September 2007). 30
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,292,1.html

zielinski-wersja-angielska.doc

with similar complaints. (see Łatak v. Poland no. 52070/08 and Łomiński v. Poland no. 33502/09 (dec... of Orchowski v. Poland (no. 17885/04) and Norbert Sikorski v. Poland (no. 17599/05) on 22 October 2009 (see... in the case of Łatak v. Poland (no. 52070/08) on 12 October 2010 (see §§ 25-54). B. Monitoring... to such a procedure (see Article 79 b §§1 and 2 of the Code of Execution of Criminal Sentences... and a physical examination) before being transferred to another detention facility or released (see paragraph 5
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,273,1.html

probacja_nr_2_21.09.pdf

81, e-mail: wojtera@ms.gov.pl W związku z równoległym publikowaniem czasopisma zarówno w wersji... . Decyzją ustawodawcy, do środków tych zaliczono m.in.: warunkowe umorzenie postępowania karnego... uwagi na wyznaczone przez ustawodawcę warunki stosowania tej instytucji (m.in. wymóg pozytywnej... .), Kary i środki karne…, op. cit., s. 937. 42 Takie równanie zakresów znaczeniowych stosuje m.in. Ł... prawnokarne, m.in. unormowania zawarte w art. 343 § 2 pkt 2 Kodeksu postępowania karnego w przypadku
http://ms.gov.pl/pl/probacja/2015/download,3042,13.html

chruscinski_eng.doc

in respect of the applicant's complaints and offered reasonable prospects of success (see Selmouni v... that this complaint is not manifestly illfounded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further... previous judgements (see, among many other authorities, Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 110 et seq... criminal gang (see paragraphs 5 and 17 above). In the Court's view, the fact that the case concerned a member of a criminal gang should be taken into account in assessing compliance with Article 5 § 3 (see
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,196,1.html

ciborek_eng.doc

and of the relevant authorities and what was at stake for the applicant in the dispute (see, among many... at the time (see, among other authorities, Humen v. Poland [GC], no. 26614/95, § 59, 15 October 1999... that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention... that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention... the consequences of which she would have to bear (see Malicka-Wąsowska v. Poland (dec.), no. 41413/98, 5
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,103,1.html

kozlowski1_eng.doc

of the situation of which the applicant complains. 57. It follows that the complaint under Article 8 on account... 5 § 1 (c). Moreover, the Court does not see any appearance of arbitrariness on the part... . 38. It follows that this complaint is manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance... of Article 5 § 3 (see Kudła v. Poland [GC], no. 30210/96, § 104, ECHR 2000XI). 42. On 29 June 2000... by the courts in other sets of proceedings (see paragraph 14 above). Accordingly, these periods are also
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,225,1.html

case-of-braun-v.-poland.docx

had been a secret collaborator with the communist-era secret services. The main question... that the Supreme Court held a hearing on 10 September 2009 at which it announced the ruling and gave the main lines of reasoning orally (see paragraph 20 above). Subsequently, it was open to the applicant... that and on 30 November 2009 he received the judgment with the reasoning (see paragraph 21 above... -month period as running from the date of service of the written judgment (see Worm v. Austria, § 33
http://bip.ms.gov.pl/pl/prawa-czlowieka/europejski-trybunal-praw-czlowieka/orzecznictwo-europejskiego-trybunalu-praw-czlowieka/download,558,1.html